ROC-USA Silence is the last thing the world will ever hear from me -- Marlee Matlin
Letter to Congress, 10/14/07
Below is a letter sent by fax by ROC-USA to each of the 435 members of the US House of Representatives on 10/14/07. It contains the strongest evidence to date for implicating the current administration in hijacking specially modified US commercial airliners via remote control and using these planes (or possibly other drones that were made to look like commercial airliners) as missiles to carry out false flag attacks against innocent US citizens on 9/11/01. It is similar to a fax sent to each of the 100 members of the US Senate on 9/20/07.
__________________________________________________________________________
October 14, 2007
RE: Your Oath of Office and Possible Acts of Treason
Dear United States Representative and Fellow Citizen:
This is an update and summary of some of the strongest publicly available evidence that implicates top officials in the US government for carrying out heinous crimes against humanity in a false flag attack against innocent US civilians on 9/11/01. A similar letter was sent to every member of the US Senate on September 20, 2007.
Despite any proclamations of “not knowing” or “ignorance of the facts” that may be presented as a defense at a future trial, any United States Representative in Congress who continues to support the current administration and its various illegal activities and occupations after having knowledge of the evidence presented in this letter today is tantamount to nothing short of treason and a violation of an oath to protect the US Constitution from enemies from within.
1. The planes were probably not hijacked on 9/11/01, at least not as claimed. If they were, it would have been the first successful hijackings of 757’s and 767’s in the history of the aircraft . Effective anti-hijacking capabilities were available long before 2001 and may have been installed in all 757’s and 767’s at the time of the purported hijackings.
Sources:
- http://www.airsafe.com/events/hijack.htm
- http://www.911-strike.com/remote_bb.htm
2. The plane that hit WTC2 may not have been a regular commercial airliner, and/or the facades of WTC2 where the plane hit may have somehow been modified, because the plane apparently pierced right through the building with its nose mostly still in tact as it came out the other side.
Sources:
- http://www.archive.org/details/cnn200109110848-0929 (see time marker 21:20)
[This is CNN live footage from 9/11/01 with the announcer stating that the plane went right through the building, though the viewers can't see it because the critical part of the shot is covered over by the CNN banner at the bottom of the screen.]*
- http://tinyurl.com/ysscje (see time markers 6:30, 5:25, and 4:55)
[This is the same footage as above except this time no CNN banner, so you can clearly see what the announcer is talking about. Note that the people posting this video are touting video trickery here as an explanation for why a plane "appears" to fly through a building. I do not support these arguments at all as most of the evidence, and especially hundreds of pretty reliable eye witness accounts, do not support this. Plus, the people posting this video make a false claim that the shape of the nose of the airplane going into the building is the same as the shape of the nose of the airplane coming out the other side -- as proof that it is all digital -- yet close inspection reveals this is not true and you can see the nose has been damaged ever so slightly and is a different shape as it emerges from the other side of WTC2.]*
- http://www.archive.org/details/abc200109110912-0954 (see time markers 0:58-1:04 and 1:56-2:06 for what appears to be a piece of the plane on fire hanging outside WTC2)
[This is pretty weak stand-alone evidence as you can't really make out exactly what is on fire, but because it does appear to be something that may not be a part of the building and is at the exact location that pieces of the plane appeared to exit the building, chances are it may be a piece of the plane/drone on fire.]* - http://shoes4industry.blogspot.com (see the October 10, 2007, video posting and comments therein)
[Any video footage that is not on the official 9/11 video archive web site at http://www.archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_archive is pretty questionable, I say, but this video footage, which records at least the sounds of the second hit, seems authentic enough and reveals more evidence that the second plane pierced right through WTC2. This video even shows what looks like pieces of the plane sitting on a street north of WTC2.]*
3. It is highly improbable for each of the world trade center towers to be so completely dustified, and in such a short time span (10-15 seconds), without some input of energy other than from gravity.
Sources:
- http://drjudywood.com/articles/BBE/BilliardBalls.html
- http://www.911blogger.com/node/9154 - Any physics textbook discussion on conservation of mass, energy, and momentum.
4. There are countless observations that are consistent with the idea that a chemical breakdown of materials, especially iron and steel, occurred (or continued to occur) after the world trade center towers had been destroyed.
Sources:
- http://www.archive.org/details/nbc200109110954-1036 (see time markers 4:45-5:05 and 7:14-7:20 and beyond for what appears to be the beginning and the continuation, respectively, of a possible chemical breakdown or “fuming” of the mostly-steel leeward facade of WTC1 just after a seemingly reactive dust cloud from the destruction of WTC2 came in contact with it).
- http://www.archive.org/details/cnn200109111011-1053 (see time marker 17:15-17:30 for what appears to be a steel spire turning to dust after the destruction of WTC1; also see http://tinyurl.com/2c2aep for a close up view of the same video clip).
- http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/New_Spire/
- http://www.drjudywood.com (see photo evidence and audio discussions of observed “fuming” and “toasted car” phenomena, including possible acts of covering up evidence of fuming phenomena with dirt, debris, and the spread of inaccurate, misleading information about the purported discovery of “molten steel” during the clean-up at ground zero). - http://www.stevenwarran.blogspot.com (additional photo evidence of possible fuming and toasted car phenomena and possible cover-up of the phenomena with dirt at the Pentagon).
5. As one of many alternative explanations, technology exists that would allow the inconspicuous coating of much of the steel frame interior of the WTC towers with explosive material (say instead of the purported fire protective coating that was continuously being “re-applied” throughout the lives of the buildings), a material that may later have been triggered with a laser from a remote location.
Sources:
- http://fdi03754139.info/911_related/nanothermite_explosion_thesis (nanoparticle-sized thermite is one possible laser-triggered explosive material) - http://tinyurl.com/yqzf99 (a recent advance in laser technology called “ultrashort laser pulsing” might allow for much faster, more explosive chemical reaction times for laser induced chemical reactions). - http://tinyurl.com/3bmlod (directed energy laser guns developed by Raytheon is a technology that may have been used to trigger chemical explosions in the WTC towers on 9/11/01).
6. It is evident just from the video footage alone that WTC 7 was purposely and skillfully destroyed by a different mechanism from the WTC towers because, unlike the WTC towers which were turned to dust from the top down, WTC 7 was destroyed from the bottom up and a relatively large amount of the building survived as a heap pile. The destruction of WTC 7 is not counted here as evidence of crimes against humanity, however, because nobody was killed in its purposeful destruction.
Source:
- http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html
This is only a partial list and does not include additional evidence that can and should be obtained through the investigative powers of the United States Congress.
Sincerely,
H. Nicole Young, Ph.D., Representative of the Citizens of the United States of America (ROC-USA)
hn_young@yahoo.com
This letter also posted at: http://shoes4industry.blogspot.com
America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter, and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.
~Abraham Lincoln
*Notes in brackets were not included in the original letter
